hey friend 💌
my dad and i were talking earlier this week about how strange it is that so many of us will treat failure like a personal indictment. he made the point that if entrepreneurs actually feared failure the way most do, none of us would've ever started anything in the first place. the businesses we love, the people we admire, the lives we're trying to build… every single one of them was built by someone who decided to swing knowing most attempts wouldn't connect.
i've been turning that over for a few days. and then a stat showed up in my feed and crystallized it: per motion's 2026 benchmarks (analyzed on over 550,000 ads, $1.3B+ in spend), only about 5% of ads become real winners. ~6% drive the majority of an account's results. the other 94% are not total bombs and they're not failures, and they're certianly not proof anyone is bad at their job. they're just… the math of trying things! it's a stat about ads but it sounds suspiciously like the rest of life :)
most jobs you apply to won't pan out. most pitches you send won't close. most friendships you make in your 20s won't last forever. most of the things you try, by sheer math, will not be the thing that works.
and in 2026 i think most of us secretly feel like that's a personal failing! like we're supposed to be batting 90% on a chart that doesn't even exist.
so today, the case for the opposite: the misses aren't a bug, they're how you make room for the wins!!
in today's counter-cultural programming:
💸 why your investing portfolio is supposed to look messy (and what it teaches us)
📱 the 5% rule, the VC mindset, and how to stop dragging yourself for testing things
🎁 a quote i can't stop sending people + a billie update
let's go ↓
your portfolio is supposed to look uneven. so are you.
here's a thing they don't tell you when you start investing: the goal isn't for every position to win. that's not how it works.
the entire premise of a diversified portfolio is that you don't know which positions will be the winners ahead of time, so you spread bets, hold them through the noise, and trust the math.
look at the s&p 500. on any given year, a handful of stocks (sometimes literally 5–10 of them) drive the majority of the index's returns. the rest are mid or losing money. and that's the same index that built generational wealth for an entire generation of "boring" investors.
if you opened your portfolio every quarter and got mad at the underperformers, you'd never hold long enough to be in the position when one of them rips.
so try this:
diversify on purpose: mix high-yield savings (boring + safe), index funds (boring + slow), and maybe one slightly higher-risk position you actually understand. the boring stuff is what makes you brave enough to hold the volatile stuff.
stop checking daily: quarterly checks are plenty. i honestly can’t tell you the last time i saw my portfolio - i’m not liquidating it anytime soon, so the volatility is irrelevant to me. dare i say checking your portfolio every morning is the financial equivalent of texting your ex ?? nothing useful comes from it.
expect uneven returns. if 7 of 10 positions are flat in a quarter, that doesn't mean you picked wrong. that means you're invested. the 3 that are up are doing the heavy lifting, exactly like they're supposed to.
the math of investing is the math of life. you spread bets, you hold form, and you let the wins (which are statistically rare) carry the misses (which are statistically the majority).
📱the 5% rule + the case for trying dumb stuff
okay so back to that stat:
~5% of ads become winners. ~6% of ads drive the majority of account results across 550,000+ ads tested.
if you're working in paid social like me, that means of the next 20 ads you make, 1 will pop. maybe 2 if you're cooking w gas. the other 18 will land somewhere between meh and mid. that's not a sign you're bad at your job, that's the average performance of a healthy testing program.
now zoom out from ad world… the same shape shows up in:
venture capital. vcs expect that out of 10 portfolio companies, 7 will return ~zero, 2 will do okay, and 1 will return the entire fund. the 1 is the whole game. they don't apologize for the 7.
publishing & media. most articles, videos, and podcast episodes flop. the few that hit drive the entire audience growth. it's why prolific creators look "lucky" — they're just at-bat way more often.
literally anything in your 20s? they’re more likely to not be the one than to be the one. that's not a personal failing, that's statistics. you have to meet a lot of people to know what you want.
the mindset shift this should give you:
stop dragging yourself for "wasting" time on things that didn't pan out! if you sent 10 cold pitches and got 1 yes, that's a 10% close rate, which is high in basically every industry.
try more things, not only better things! the math says you find winners by increasing your number of attempts, not by trying to perfect the one attempt. five medium-effort variations beats one polished one almost every time.
right-size your expectations. if you're testing a new content angle, a new offer, a new client niche, expect ~5 out of 20 to do something interesting. anything better than that is a great quarter.
the catch: trying more things only works if each individual attempt is cheap enough that 19 misses don't sink you. financially, emotionally, in time. if every attempt feels devastating when it misses, the issue isn't that you're failing too much, it's that you've made each attempt too expensive. the goal isn't to attempt less. it's to attempt smaller.
🧠 what i’m loving rn
benchmark: intern programs that document SOPs before day 1 retain ~3x more interns!! sooo most "intern attrition" isn't bad culture, it's bad onboarding 😳
read: harvard business review's piece on building high-agency work cultures has been on my mind all week.
quote:
"you can't connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backward."
totally random: billie has now learned to open my closet. she is escalating her training program faster than i can.
help keep teague talk free!
🍵 quick ad break
learn the financial modeling skills wall street actually uses
if you've ever wanted the same self-paced courses used by goldman, morgan stanley, and the big four to onboard new hires. whether you're trying to pivot into finance, sharpen your founder financial chops, or just stop feeling lost when a vc throws around terms like ebitda multiple.
PE training trusted by Blackstone.
Wall Street Prep trains analysts inside Blackstone, KKR, and Carlyle. Now they've teamed up with Wharton Online to bring that same program to you over 8 weeks:
Join LIVE office hours with Wharton Business School faculty, to pressure-test your deal assumptions in real time
Earn a Wharton Online certificate in Private Equity (something more defensible than "I'm pretty good at Excel")
Get lifetime access to materials, events, and a network of 5,000+ professionals who are just as obsessed with deal flow as you are
Program starts June 8. Code SAVE300 saves $300 on tuition.
clicking also keeps teague talk free, which is my favorite kind of win-win 🤍
also keeping us free this week: inflow — their 3-minute quiz on adhd traits is quick, weirdly validating, and screenshot-worthy. if you've ever wondered why the same productivity hacks that work for everyone else don't work for you, this is the start of an actual answer.
ADHD management designed for how your brain actually works
Most ADHD apps are just glorified timers. Inflow is different - built by people with ADHD, backed by clinical psychologists, using CBT-inspired strategies. Learn to manage time blindness, burnout, overwhelm, and procrastination in 5-minute daily modules. Real tools, real change.

we’re moving up in the world, people!!!!!! thanks for reading 🥹
now back to our regularly scheduled programming...
🪞 updates from HQ
🎉 just signed a really exciting new partnership !!! this one's a long-term play and a really meaningful next chapter for teague media 🤍 more on that soon.
🌐 savvie.org is officially live! the home for all things financial literacy for women in their 20s and 30s. go poke around → savvie.org. long overdue and i'm so glad it's finally out in the world.
🩷 we're hiring 3 summer interns + apps close 5/25. reply for the link to apply or forward this to someone you know would crush it.
🎨 summer '26 creative partner spots are open at teague media. if your brand could use a creative engine, here's how we work together:
🚀 creative sprint (from $800, 7-day delivery)
🎨 creative partner (from $1,500/mo) — our most-loved offer
🧠 strategy intensive (from $1,200)
📍 local shoots (from $300, same-week) for LA + ventura county brands
70+ brands. 35% above industry avg retention. 7-day avg turnaround.
other places i'd love to see you:
made it this far? that’s all for this week.
thanks for reading 💌
think about a recent "miss" — a pitch that didn't close, a post that flopped, a relationship that didn't go anywhere, a job that didn't pan out.
now ask yourself: was that actually a failure, or was it the math?
if you can name 5 things you've tried recently that didn't work, you're probably not failing, you're at-bat. and that's the whole game! (if you can't name 5? the issue might be that you haven't tried enough lately. that's a different fix entirely.)
i used to think the goal was to bat 1.000. now i think the goal is to keep showing up to bat!!
the wins, when they come, are statistically rare. the misses are how you afford the wins. the only real failure is being so afraid of the misses that you stop swinging!
bat more, swing smaller + let the math do its job!
xo,
callie 🤍
p.s. tell me about a recent "loss" that ended up being part of how you found a "win!”
forward to a friend (especially if they'd be a great summer intern)
follow @withsavvie + @teague.media
reply and tell me: what's one "loss" you're done dragging yourself for?


